Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 2 Agreement between clinical examinations performed physically in the stable or by recorded video

From: Comparing video examinations with physical clinical examinations using finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings as a model

 

Veterinarian 1

Veterinarian 2

Veterianarian 3

Veterinarian 4

Meanb

Agreement

Kappa (95% con)a

Agreement

Kappa (95% con)a

Agreement

Kappa (95% con)a

Agreement

Kappa (95% con)a

Kappa (SD)

General examination

         

Abnormal weight distribution on one or more legs (yes/no)

0.99 (101/102)

0.80 (0.40; 1.00)

0.99 (101/102)

0.80 (0.40; 1.00)

0.99 (101/102)

0.80 (0.40; 1.00)

0.99 (101/102)

0.80 (0.40; 1.00)

0.80 (0.0)

Restricted gait movements (yes/no)

1.00 (102/102)

1.00 (1.0; 1.0)

0.96 (98/102)

0.65 (0.33; 0.97)

0.99 (101/102)

0.80 (0.40; 1.00)

0.98 (100/102)

0.74 (0.40; 1.00)

0.80 (0.15)

Lame (pig level) (yes/no)

0.99 (101/102)

0.8 (0.40; 1.00)

0.99 (101/102)

0.88 (0.66; 1.00)

0.98 (100/102)

0.66 (0.22; 1.00)

1.00 (102/102)

1.00 (1.00; 1.00)

0.84 (0.14)

Spontaneous signs of pain (yes/no)

1.00 (102/102)

1.00 (1.00; 1.00)

0.97 (96/99)

0.65 (0.28; 1.00)

0.99 (97/98)

0.98 (100/102)

0.49 (− 0.11; 1.00)

0.71 (0.26)

Umbilical outpouching

         

Consistence (firm, soft)

0.91 (93/102)

0.62 (0.39; 0.84)

0.97 (99/102)

0.81 (0.60; 1.00)

0.80 (82/102)

0.22 (0.02; 0.43)

0.88 (89/101)

0.27 (− 0.02; 0.57)

0.48 (0.28)

Reducibility (yes/no)

0.88 (89/101)

0.60 (0.40; 0.80)

0.88 (89/101)

0.45 (0.19; 0.70)

0.70 (71/102)

0.28 (0.13; 0.43)

0.70 (69/98)

0.33 (0.16; 0.50)

0.42 (0.14)

Wounds present (yes/no)

0.94 (96/102)

0.88 (0.79; 0.97)

0.89 (90/101)

0.74 (0.61; 0.87)

0.94 (96/102)

0.88 (0.79; 0.97)

0.98 (99/101)

0.96 (0.91; 1.00)

0.87 (0.09)

Number of wounds > 4 cm2

0.88 (36/41)

0.76 (0.56; 0.95)

0.91 (30/33)

0.82 (0.62; 1.00)

0.86 (37/43)

0.71 (0.49; 0.92)

0.96 (43/45)

0.91 (0.79; 1.00)

0.80 (0.09)

Specific wound examination

         

Location (bottom/side)

0.92 (45/49)

0.31 (− 0.16; 0.78)

0.85 (40/47)

0.29 (− 0.10; 0.67)

0.94 (46/49)

0.64 (0.19; 1.00)

0.85 (40/47)

0.39 (0.04; 0.74)

0.41 (0.16)

Necrosis present (yes/no)

0.94 (46/49)

0.63 (0.25; 1.00)

0.67 (33/49)

0.71 (35/49)

0.44 (0.21; 0.68)

0.94 (46/49)

0.37 (− 0.19; 0.93)

0.48 (0.13)

Severe wound (yes/no)

0.76 (37/49)

0.50 (0.26; 0.75)

0.84 (41/49)

0.61 (0.37; 0.84)

0.82 (40/49)

0.57 (0.33; 0.81)

0.80 (39/49)

0.39 (0.09; 0.68)

0.52 (0.10)

"Open" wound (yes/no)

0.90 (44/49)

0.26 (− 0.15; 0.67)

0.73 (36/49)

0.48 (0.25; 0.71)

0.90 (44/49)

0.26 (− 0.15; 0.67)

1.00 (49/49)

1.00 (1.00; 1.00)

0.50 (0.35)

Prognosis (guarded + poor)/good))

0.86 (42/49)

0.61 (0.35; 0.86)

0.76 (37/49)

0.19 (− 0.04; 0.43)

0.86 (42/49)

0.68 (0.47; 0.90)

0.71 (35/49)

0.24 (0.001; 0.49)

0.43 (0.25)

Conclusion

         

Fit for transport (yes/with precautionary measures/no)

0.83 (85/102)

0.76 (0.65; 0.87)

0.69 (70/102)

0.54 (0.40; 0.67)

0.68 (69/102)

0.59 (0.47; 0.72)

0.88 (90/102)

0.79 (0.68; 0.90)

0.67 (0.12)

  1. The table displays the clinical signs recorded as categorical variables and only those clinical signs where the mean Cohen’s Kappa value across the four Veterinarians was above 0.4 (n = 102 finishing pigs with umbilical outpouchings)
  2. aCohen’s Kappa value with 95% confidence interval limits
  3. bMean Cohen’s Kappa value across the four Veterinarians, SD = standard deviation